FOR PROFIT BUT ALSO FOR GOOD?
Social impact bonds (SIBs), a new way to fund public health services, allow private entrepreneurs—equity funds, individuals—to manage and potentially earn a profit by organizing social programs that state and local governments may not run efficiently. For example, investors could develop a system to reduce prison recidivism and share the public savings (reductions in prison costs) with the sponsoring government. While SIBs, dozens of which are now active in the US, may appear as low-risk collaborations for governments interested in pursuing underfunded programs such as affordable housing, these researchers point out that SIBs are typically aimed at highly racialized issues such as prison recidivism, teen pregnancy, and homelessness. SIBs may not address the root causes of these difficult social problems and might undermine some existing social services.
|
|
NURSE PRACTITIONERS AND COUNTRY LIVING
The association of American Medical Colleges predicts a shortage of 120,000 physicians overall by the year 2030, estimating a shortfall of up to 49,300 primary care physicians in the United States. The role of nurse practitioners in the primary care setting may increase, however, as their numbers are expected to rise over the next decade. In light of these predictions, Barnes and colleagues studied the trends in nurse practitioners who practiced in rural and nonrural primary care settings between 2008 and 2016.
The researchers analyzed a dataset featuring characteristics of doctors’ offices, focusing on the number of nurse practitioners, physicians, and physician assistants. As the figure above depicts, they found that the proportion of nurse practitioners as a percentage of total primary care providers grew from 17.6% to 25.2% in rural areas over the observed years. Nonrural areas also saw a growth in the presence of nurse practitioners, from 15.9% to 23%. Although physicians made up the largest proportion of providers in both rural and nonrural settings, their percentage dwindled. Further, the authors found that a greater proportion of rural practices featured nurse practitioners among their provider teams compared to nonrural practices.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality identifies high-functioning primary care teams as those including multidisciplinary involvement. Considering their findings, and other data documenting the high satisfaction with care from nurse practitioners and their lower practice costs compared to physicians, Barnes and the other researchers suggest that policymakers invest more in nurse practitioner education.—Sampada Nandyala, PHP Fellow
Feature image from “Rural And Nonrural Primary Care Physician Practices Increasingly Rely On Nurse Practitioners,” Hilary Barnes, Michael R. Richards, Matthew D. McHugh, and Grant Martsolf, Health Affairs 37, No. 6 (2018): 908–914.
|
|
|
|