
Wrong-to-Carry Laws
States passed right-to-carry laws under the expectation that they would decrease crimes. Evidence now contradicts the basic premise of right-to-carry laws.
...moreStates passed right-to-carry laws under the expectation that they would decrease crimes. Evidence now contradicts the basic premise of right-to-carry laws.
...moreIn 2009, Michigan began the Double Up Food Bucks program, expanding options for SNAP beneficiaries to spend on fruits and vegetables.
...moreWhether essential social support and companionship from dogs extends to significant changes in human well-being or mental health remains relatively unknown.
...moreThe gap between White and Black homeowners has reached its widest margin in 50 years, underscoring the need for new, transformative legislation and action.
...moreThere is room for improvement across the country in both urban and rural schools to better their water access and testing standards.
...moreAvailability of vegetarian options in cafeterias promoted healthier diets. The move would lower emissions of human-generated greenhouse gases if scaled.
...moreHow we act today will determine whether antibiotics can still be successfully used in the future as the threat of antimicrobial resistance grows.
...moreVaccine advocates are drowning out vaccine denouncers. Very few are engaging others and changing opinions as tweeters exist in separate bubbles.
...moreChanges to Title X could impose an impossible choice for American women: accept limited and potentially misleading care or forgo family planning altogether.
...more